| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 |
181. Eve Market Data Dumps - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Rhivre wrote: There is someone in the lounge ingame who uses trading software in Eve, I havent had any coffee yet today, so I cannot remember his name right now, but, I will endeavour to remember once I have woken up a bit, otherwise I will try...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.15 12:47:29
|
182. Trading reform and economic operations - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I would give it a try if it was only about 10b. But there's just no way the OP can get 50 dudes aboard.
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.13 20:50:12
|
183. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Like this: Skia Aumer wrote: if citadel uses its weapons, it becomes vulnerable for 15 minutes .
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 22:06:04
|
184. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sonya Corvinus wrote: Skia Aumer wrote: Fixing citadels is exactly what I'm talking about. But why do you want them to be removed from gates? Funny how your fix for citadels doesn't change them at all, but instead changes a part of the ga...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 21:56:46
|
185. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Skia Aumer wrote: I mean, we have an engagement mechanics for ships, which includes 1-minute weapon timer. Why shouldnt similar mechanics be in place for citadels? This removes the defensive and "home field advantag...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 21:04:40
|
186. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: ...it's that there was not way for a small roaming gang to deal with them. I never minded when sov-holders dropped a bajillion supers on me - that was fine they put toys on the field and made plays. It's the fact that the ...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 20:24:29
|
187. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Max Groote wrote: This is a really reasonable change and it makes a lot of sense. The people saying "don't warp gate to gate" don't realise that a gate camp can actually be dealt with by a small group of players, while a citadel cannot . The "...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 20:01:26
|
188. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Querns wrote: Grath Telkin wrote: I'd leave it be. Eve is all about emergent game play right, these bubbles and citadels are something none of us saw coming, its allowed the owners of space to recraft that space into a fortress (something s...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 19:57:36
|
189. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: The current range that warp bubbles are effective (how far from your destination they can pull you out of warp) is a little unclear. This has lead to some 'interesting' possibilities, such as bubble camping a gate with a cit...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.07.01 19:40:54
|
190. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Planet Busta wrote: Watch the logins drop after it is removed :D Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Active phase of Goon War is over, "content" conflicts are not that exciting. Citadel land rush is falling off too. And it's summer - time to see some ...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 17:24:26
|
191. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
nezroy wrote: Since this is going away, I hope CCP will look at adding a "10k SP injector restricted to <5M SP characters" item to the game and have it be part of the reward tracks on their new event system (the Shadow thingy and future simi...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 17:10:23
|
192. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ripard Teg wrote: I'm glad you guys got the data you were looking for, and I'm even more glad that you saw the same thing that a lot of us predicted . I hope you guys will address the underlying causes here, rather than the symptoms. The unde...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 15:28:24
|
193. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Travis Uchonela wrote: Disappointed. This was a big hit for the new players in Horde and a good way to get guys flying around in space. I'm not that surprised it wasn't drawing people to log in that wouldn't have anyway but It definitely got pe...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 15:14:36
|
194. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Good riddance. Props for acknowledging mistake and fixing it fast.
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 14:57:09
|
195. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Crazy Vania wrote: Can a Carrier on sisi kill a single interceptor? No. Can it force the interceptor to drop the point? Yes, after approx 60 seconds, but not using Cenobytes or Fighters or Grams, but using 2x Heavy neuts, just like any old batt...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.23 14:09:56
|
196. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Made NChina wrote: Useless work because of an useless change..... That is what third party dev are thinking.... three months to do the work ... Three Months for remaking what is already working at the moment !! Enablers are the people who ma...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.20 23:05:50
|
197. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kalpel wrote: So CCP puts the work load on the customers to find a "reliable" overlay Exactly my concern. I can understand why they're removing IGB, but make a proper workaround. Yes, you - CCP. Dont put this burden on our shoulders.
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.20 22:41:16
|
198. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: overlay Are you shipping overlay thingy in your installation package?
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.20 21:47:41
|
199. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: So how 'bout it CCP Rise? Any chance of an update on how the feature is working or at least some time frame on when you will evaluate the success of the feature and announce further iterations? I'd like to hear on that too....
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.20 11:30:38
|
200. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Do you folks really want to pigeon-hole carriers into The Role ? Carrier is a hull above battleship, decent and versatile - that is the role. As they are drone-based unlike BS, which are mostly turret-based, it may not be really obvious. But thi...
- by Skia Aumer - at 2016.06.20 09:47:32
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |